About Me

Name: beltway girl
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obama's Spectacle

Senator Obama made a lot of promises tonight.  And, for the moment, for this big, Obama moment, held in a venue worthy of either Madonna or the Pope, those rhetorical gifts delivered, and delivered big.
 
They couldn't get enough of Senator Obama tonight.  He could have told that audience that his real choice for veep would be Socks the cat, or a convicted murderer, and they would all have cheered the same way.  He could have told many there they would have to provide a year of community service working at the local Pizza Hut or White Castle just to cast their votes for him, and they'd all have cheered the same way.
 
He could have told them infanticide was a woman's right to choose.  And they'd all have cheered the same way.
 
In fact, he did tell them that. 
 
And they all cheered just the same way.
 
He gave them every carrot to the Republican stick.  Free health care, tax relief for everyone but the rich, more money for education, etc. 
 
John McCain was, of course, maligned.  Not really gutsy.  A wimp who refused to go get Bin Laden in his cave.  Or was that Bush?  Does it matter?
 
Former president Jimmy Carter earlier had said McCain had "milked" his POW status for everything it was worth in this election.
 
Perhaps President Carter should be asked if he also feels that Senator Obama has also "milked" his biracial status for everything it is worth at this point.  Or whether Obama has "milked" his mother's death from cancer for everything it's worth in his crusade for universal health care.
 
It wasn't very nice to read President Carter's wrong-headed words today.  Nor was it easy to listen to Senator Obama's words.
 
The ears of many liberals will prick up after that statement.  If you don't like his words, they will note, it's because you fear them.
 
Correct.
 
And you fear them because they challenge your own antiquated and ill-founded beliefs.
 
Incorrect.
 
You see, Senator Obama says from one side of his mouth that we are all our brother's keeper, and our sister's keeper.  But out of the other side of his mouth, he says he is pro-choice where his sister is concerned.
 
It seems like there's a failure to communicate in terms of one side of Senator Obama's brain with the other side.  Will the real Barack Obama please stand up?
 
Because we do fear your words, Senator Obama.  They're a crystal-clear indication of how truly inexperienced you are in foreign policy, and also what an either completely misguided person you are, or what a hypocrite you are.  You owned America tonight.  And you said, "America, you cannot go back."
 
Right you are.  Let's hope America doesn't turn back from rejecting you in November, and electing John McCain.  Because Barack Obama should not be elected America's "keeper" in 2008. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Today on "Barack and Friends"

(CNN, closed captioned, ALL DAY)  season finale.  bill skips barack's big speech to meet someone he found on match.com.  the workman who supplies the doric columns somehow misunderstands when barack says he wants them made of alabaster, and thinks barack is telling him he thinks someone is such a bas--rd.  so the columns are spray-painted cardboard, and keep flying off the stage the entire time he tries to give his speech.  not only that, but a racoon, nested beneath the stage, somehow ends up on stage for the speech.  barack chases the racoon with a boom mike, accidentally striking the animal, putting nancy pelosi into a rage.  britney spears shows up in a fury, noting that no one received permission to use anything from her set.  people of faith wonder how barack mysteriously knew it wasn't going to rain that night.  joe biden rankles barack and others when he begins throwing around a football with bill richardson directly beneath the stage about halfway through the speech.  a dope ring is found to be operated by none other than MSNBC anchors!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Put on a Happy Face

Tonight's convention festivities seemed especially marked by good will.  Anyone unaware of the various strains of soap opera lurking beneath the surface would have received all of this as being completely authentic; but such a person, unaware of the intrigues at this point, would be very difficult to find, indeed.  Bill Clinton was his usual chipper, average guy, happy-go-lucky self.  Joe Biden seemed positively tickled to be on that stage, the arguably unlikely recipient of so much confidence from another, a vast reservoir of confidence himself.  The Democrats put on a happy face today.  The problem is that so much of the audience knows it's put on.
 
If you had to look at any single speech or event thus far in this spectacle to get a handle on what really is the story here, it would have to be the roll call vote.  It showed a steady rhythm, with Hillary Clinton garnering about a quarter of the vote so long as it endured, which was until it reached New York.  Then, it fell squarely in Mrs. Clinton's lap. 
 
It was obviously fully choreographed, a gratuity for Clinton, one that actually was more of an insult to her campaign than a compliment.  But she appeared gracious at the end of it all, and waved her fairy godmother wand over the name of Barack Obama.
 
In the meantime, interviews with furious Clinton supporters were letting pundits know they'd be walking to the McCain camp come this fall. 
 
Leaving The Reservation.
 
Could it be happening?  Is the Democratic Party falling apart?
 
The Democratic Party will never "fall apart."  There will always be a Democratic Party in the United States of America.  However, the party may finally have been forced to come to grips with the price of its radicalism.
 
Democrats like to look at themselves as dreamers and utopians.  They care.  And this, more than anything else one could imagine, is what they think they do better than anyone else.  They care.
 
What types of things do they care about?
 
Wars.  Wars are bad.  They kill people.  So no more wars.  (Wars=Bad)
 
Ask a Democrat if WWII was "bad."  Wailing results, and, with the more shrewd Dem, the response is that you are a demagogue and a warmongerer, trying to justify all escalation of conflict on the spine of the only justified war, ever.  Okay, and maybe WWI.  But only maybe. 
 
What other types of things do Democrats care about?
 
Trans-fats.  And cigarettes (particularly cigarettes).  Cigarettes kill people.  (Cigarettes=Bad)
 
Okay, but shouldn't adults be allowed to smoke a cigarette if they like to do so?  There is wailing again, and people just don't know what's good for them.
 
Okay.
 
So do Democrats care about premarital sex?
 
Oh, yes, of course.
 
Well, since people don't know what's good for them, do you tell them not to have it?
 
"No.  We give them condoms."
 
Why condoms?
 
"Well, we know they're just going to do it anyway."
 
But they won't just smoke cigarettes anyway, or join the military in peace, evidently.
 
And of course, where all this merry discourse always leads back to is abortion.
 
If a tree falls in a forest, but no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
 
If a pregnant woman smokes a cigarette, does it matter?
 
Guess it depends on whether she's on her way to Wal-Mart to pick up a crib or on her way to Planned Parenthood.
 
The Dems' embrace of radicalism may prove rather expensive, as every presidential election since 1973 has proven.  And you'll find the most eerie reflection of this embrace in the McCain ad, "Tiny."  Just this little country that means no harm.
 
"The greatest destroyer of peace is abortion, because if a mother can kill her own child, what is left for me to kill you and you to kill me?  There is nothing between."  -Mother Theresa. 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary's Moment

Hillary Clinton delivered what may have been the best and most important speech of her life tonight.  Looking confident and well-rested, she showed the party why she won all those votes and took all those states.
 
The reason why Hillary is not on this ticket remains a mystery.  Some sources have suggested that the veep vetting process would have involved releasing damaging documents regarding Bill's donors to the Presidential Library.  This is ridiculous.  This woman was herself competing for the presidency.  Any such damaging documents should either already have been exposed in her own candidacy or would ultimately have been exposed had Obama not amassed enough delegates to put her out of the running. 
 
The logic is ridiculous.  The UK Telegraph noted in a story in July that a Dem strategist had said the Obama camp would have to see records for the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Library in order to be sure there were no "ticking timebombs in there."  This was, interestingly, something Obama had questioned her about during the primaries.
 
Some might argue that oh, well, this makes it very clear.  Obama would look like a complete hypocrite if he took Hillary on the ticket without a complete vetting.
 
Bunkum.  As if taking Joe Biden, the ultimate Washington insider, Iraq War-voting Joe Biden, wouldn't be vastly more hypocritical?
 
Had Senator Obama really wanted to take Hillary Clinton on as a running mate, he could have done so.  None in the dog-eat-dog, eager-beaver press had already followed up on his suggestions to make Bill Clinton's donors into an issue.  And there's no indication that they would have done so in the future.  Even had something broken, could it possibly top Obama's own "issues" at this point?  Highly unlikely.
 
Either Barack Obama didn't want Hillary Clinton at the bottom of his ticket, or she herself didn't want to be Obama's Number Two.
 
Which is it?
 
Let's explore the first option.
 
By the time we'd reached the stage of the fateful Obama capaign text message, things were already on a downhill slide for Barack Obama.  He was not doing well in the polls, was coming off a poor performance at Saddleback, and was imbued in a bitter battle over his official position on infanticide.  Etc.
 
Hillary Clinton would've provided just the jolt he needed to turn his flailing candidacy into a formidable force.  Hillary Clinton would've packed instantaneous power into the ticket and added immediate bounce at the polls.
 
So why wouldn't he add Hillary?
 
Theories abound.  Ego.  The overpowering Bill.  A frosty relationship with Hillary herself.
 
On the other side of this is the hypothesis that Hillary may have taken her own veep possibilities out of play.
 
Why would she do it?
 
Ego again.  It would be something to be considered here, too.  "It's going to be me."  This was the inevitable nominee for a long, long time.  Hillary Clinton felt she had worked, scratched, and clawed to be at the top of that ticket.
 
It's quite possible that Hillary might pay polite lip service to an Obama veep post, but would reject it outright if it ever became a reality.  Not all that long ago, such a scenario would have been viewed as a joke by the Clintons.
 
Next, we have the idea that Hillary may have been protecting her own interests and political survival.  Obama is, by no means, an unencumbered candidate, and, at this point, he is not looking like an inevitable president.  We have issues and stories swirling around his head in great numbers.  At this very moment, the same press that hasn't bitten at Clinton donor scandals is chewing at the bit for Annenberg documents, which involve the Obama-Ayers connection.  We've got Wright, infanticide, Ludacris, and so much more.
 
And the very same factors that would have spurred an Obama to run to Hillary, the poll numbers, Saddleback, Obama's upcoming separation from the teleprompter, all of these same facts of life would put Hillary running from Obama's veep tap like it was a rat carrying bubonic plague.
 
What makes this mystery all the more interesting is that we may never know what actually happened.  Right now, pundits are musing over this, and the general concensus is that Obama took a pass.
 
Don't be too sure.  Had Hillary actually been the one to take the pass, would Obama's campaign want this leaked?
 
And would Hillary want to suffer the reprecussions from her party had this been the case?
 
Even in the event that party higher-ups had known, would they want this made public?
 
As Hillary Clinton stood on the stage tonight, she looked relaxed, she looked powerful, and she looked natural.  She delivered a phenomenal speech under the circumstances.  And Barack Obama, now fighting along without her, looks extremely vulnerable and weak.  The Obiden "bounce" is speaking for itself, and when Barack Obama loses in November, this woman will have won.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tomorrow/Preview: "Barack and Friends"

Barack wonders how they're going to cover up Joe Biden's nervous breakdown on the stump.  The archdiocese of Denver threatens to perform an exorcism on Nancy Pelosi, and says they may expand it to the entire Dem party, if necessary.  Bill secretly decides to forego a speech on the assigned topic of foreign policy, and decides he'll give one on the history of baseball instead.  Hillary finally releases her delegates-- to John McCain!  McCain frostily declines an invitation to speak on Thursday, noting he's not really a Democrat.  The Dems face fierce reprisals for serving Coke in the Pepsi Center.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Today: A Very Special "Barack and Friends"

(CNN, closed captioned, ALL DAY) Joe Biden sees the polls and bursts into tears while speaking before a crowd, but conceals the true reason for his anxiety.  When Hillary goes to take the stage for her big speech, the music from "Jaws" somehow begins to play.  Miffed, Hillary dons a "Hillary in '12" cap and gives a speech about Bill, which lasts about five hours.  By the time Obama takes the stage, the entire audience has fallen asleep.  Barack begins to wonder if he perhaps shouldn't have taken Hillary on the ticket after all.  (Special musical guest: Ludacris)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tonight on "Barack and Friends"

 
(CNN, 5 p.m., closed captioned, ALL NIGHT) Bill continues making trouble for Barack by demanding to speak about something other than foreign policy during his speech.  Michelle wonders how she'll be able to look nonchalant while she continues to worry that Hillary supporters might rock the boat during the roll call vote.  One of the Barack and Friends crew accidentally calls a Hillary bud an "Uncle Tom," rankling things on the national scene.  Joe Biden repeatedly sticks his foot in his mouth before even being permitted to speak, and Howard Dean is pelted with crumpled-up Obiden signs by enraged Hillary fans.  Jeremiah Wright leaves angry voice mails after he finally comes to grips with the fact that he couldn't do the invocation.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is It The Ideas, Stupid?

Bill Clinton, the only Dem in the presidential winning column since single-termer Jimmy Carter.  According to analysis of polling data, is Obama following in his footsteps?
 
It does not appear this way.  In August of 1992, Bill Clinton had a monstrous lead of about 26 points at one point.  This tightened to about nine points after the Republican National Convention. 
 
Clinton also enjoyed juggernaut-scale leads at this time of year, particularly in August, over opponent Bob Dole in 1996.
 
Now, granted, Ross Perot was an enormous factor in the 1992 election, and even led in polls in the spring.  He ultimately garnered about 19% of the vote in the general election.  Clinton received only a plurality in that election with 43% of the total vote, while George H. W. Bush received about 37%.
 
However, Perot was not a significant factor in the 1996 race, but we should note that Clinton would at that time have been the incumbent.  And although Clinton still did not break the 50% mark in terms of the total vote, he won very handily over Dole, and those August polling numbers would have presaged that victory.
 
So excluding, for now, the 1992 race because of the Perot factor, we can still at least reliably consider the data for the 1996 race, and also put the numbers for 1992 on the table.
 
In 1996, Dems would have been confident, even in August, that they had a winner.  Now, the premise of this article is that a very hefty lead is necessary at this time of year, specifically in August, to score an ultimate Dem victory.  Some might refute this by noting the data in the Michael Dukakis bid in 1988.  But in this case, we should note that the pre-convention numbers for Dukakis in that year, with a late July convention, showed him with a six-point lead before the convention.  This cannot possibly compare to Clinton's comparable numbers in 1996, but we have to consider he was an incumbent that year.  In 1992, we have the Perot factor, and we'd note that Clinton's pre-convention numbers might have sometimes been close to Dukakis's numbers, at various points.  But it is also to be figured into this that once Clinton gained a lead over Bush in July of that year, he never ceded it. 
 
So let's also look at the year 2000, and we'd have Gore, who went on to lose the election (remember Florida) in the electoral college, but who did win the popular vote by a razor-thin margin.  Gallup recorded notoriously erratic results in that election, but a four-point lead held by Gore in August was-- indeed-- something of a precursor of the actual outcome.  Gore nearly took the presidency.  And another poll in August even showed a statistical tie, another very, very reliable indication of what was to come.
 
Now let's look at Kerry.  Kerry led the polls in July by eight points at one point, enjoying something of a bounce with his veep selection, John Edwards.
 
By the end of August, Bush had caught up with Kerry, however. 
 
And looking at this from another angle, in terms of enjoying a bounce from veep selections, this has also been shown to make a difference when you look at the polling data.
 
Dole, in 1996, had an electrifying vice presidential selection in Jack Kemp, and he enjoyed a nine-point bounce after naming him.  Bush enjoyed a three-point bounce after naming Cheney, a (granted) less than jolting choice.  Gore gained five points after tapping Lieberman, now a name being bandied about by the McCain campaign.  And Kerry moved four points ahead with Edwards. 
 
Returning to the contest at hand, Gallup showed the race in a very dead heat in its poll released today.  So far, no Biden bounce is apparent.
 
And even if it were, the one thing that the doomed Dole bid of '96 can show us is that voters cast their votes for a president, not a vice president. 
 
If you look at the polling numbers, they seem to be foreshadowing yet another doomed Dem ticket.  And the numbers show us even more than that.
 
Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter are the only Dems in the winning column since Kennedy & LBJ.  And even when we look at these winners, Carter served only one term and Clinton couldn't break the 50% mark for his second term.  On top of that, Clinton may have arguably owed his first term to the Perot factor.
 
One has to wonder about this very long list of losses and whether it means something.
 
Could it be the Dem platform?
 
Perhaps so.  If it is, don't look for a landslide Obama win this year.  And if it's close, it might not go for the Dems, either.  When it's that close, the map doesn't seem to favor the Dems, as the Bush-Gore contest of 2000 showed us.  And another tell-tale sign-- also tied to that 2000 race-- that it won't go Obama's way if it's that close is that Lieberman, the veep for the Gore ticket that year, is now under consideration by McCain.  The broader point to be gleamed from this, though, is that when the voters don't like your ideas, no pocket of votes anywhere-- including Florida or Ohio-- is going to help you pull this one out. 
 
Is it the ideas, stupid?
 
Maybe.  And if it is, no election is going to show this in more stark contrast than the one now in the hands of the American voters.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Lotto

This was the moment.
 
This was the moment when the highly presumptive Democratic Party's nominee subordinated millions of voters to his own "view."
 
This was the moment when his supporters got a 3 a.m. text message naming Joe Biden as his losing mate.
 
This was the moment that the schism in the Democratic Party manifested itself in a very prominent and convincingly alarming manner for the average voter.  And this was the moment that Rush Limbaugh prayed for.  This was the moment when an Obama, tied in the polls with a McCain, just didn't seem to have that same, electrifying spark with the teleprompter outside the Old State Capitol in Springfield. 
 
This was the moment that the Democratic Party Family got to tour the house that Barack built.  Hillary and Bill are outside in the guesthouse, while Barack and Joe are in the living room with their feet propped up on the coffee table.  The "alleged" rift in the Dem family is being blamed on Republican spin by MSNBC, but Bill and Hillary are watching it all from a different television set than the new power couple.  Oh, sure, it suits the Dems to blame this on the Republicans, but the Democratic Party woman, who won about half as many Dem votes cast in the contest this year, is being discarded in all of this like she was last year's sweater. 
 
This was the moment when an awful lot of people looked at their cell phones in a state of complete indifference and said, "Oh."
 
This is the moment when breathtaking pandemonium may overtake the Democratic National Convention.  This is the moment when Mad Mac stakes out said convention to study its developments for himself.  But whatever else happens, remember that this was the moment when Barack Obama lost the general election for the Democrats.
 
Speaking of Mad Mac, John McCain, the Dems love to think a guy with seven, eight, ten...  Oh, what the hell, let's say fifteen?  Well, a guy with  that many houses, a guy who can't possibly relate to the average American.  And boy, they're having a great time with this, and with joking about how this guy, with all these houses, is just so out of touch.
 
Maybe they should count in the twenty or so houses he lived in during his youth, when he was following his father around as his father served his country.  And were they going to count all the houses this guy lived in when he served the country himself?  Will that include the one in Hanoi?
 
Probably not because this won't make for such an effective commercial. 
 
The Dems are not going to find it easy to beat a McCain without soiling themselves in the process.  But that won't stop them because they have such a very, very hard time seeing anything in a big picture other than what they themselves want to see.
 
And so now, in this case, has it gone with this Biden moment.  Except now the big picture is, unfortunately for them, their own party, and some of the bricks are missing from the house Barack built. 
 
Barack Obama really needed Hillary Clinton for this moment, for this house he's built.  And yet, Hillary Clinton was nowhere to be found.  Why is that?
 
Perhaps Mrs. Clinton realized that Obama is going to lose this election without her.  And perhaps she likes that idea just enough to let him lose and try another bid herself in 2012.  Perhaps she was offered the veep post and declined.  This would explain the lack of a paper trail for her in the vetting process better than anything else.  Because had Obama simply always had his mind set against her, a paper trail--just for show-- would almost certainly have been created. 
 
The true nature of this, which the average viewer will perhaps never know, will arguably decide the nature of the upcoming convention in Denver.  If it was really an omission from even consideration of the woman with all those votes, look for a convention that looks like it was being held at the Bronx Zoo; if not, look for your usual infomercial. 
 
Did a rejected Barack Obama find refuge with a receptive Joe Biden?  Or did he, singlehandedly, throw away the surest shot at the White House for the Democratic Party just because of his ego, and, you know, the Bill and Hillary Show? 
 
He was always an avid viewer himself. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (17) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The 2008 Democratic Party Clinton Tribute, Aug 25-28

Welcome to Clinton Tribute Week, August 25-28, 2008, Denver.  This event will have a big impact on Denver and its greater metro area.  Expect most of the action at the Pepsi Center, but events will also be scheduled at alternative venues.  Please contact Barbara Boxer if you want to participate in the Choice Project, where feminists will be building a Coke Center, later to be used as a Planned Parenthood.  All tools donated to the project will be awarded to young women seeking to pursue careers in heavy manual labor jobs previously thought to be unsuitable for women.
 
Here are some of the events you can look forward to at Clinton Tribute Week.  (Please note that some events necessarily overlap with topics relevant to the upcoming general election.)
 
BREAKFAST WITH BILL AND HILLARY- Aug 25, 8 a.m., McDonald's Restaurant Drive-Thru and parking lot near the hotel.  BYOB.
 
INVOCATION- Aug. 25, noon, Enchanted Forest Trail, Denver.  Delivered by Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, and a yet to be determined lesbian pastor to be chosen via raffle (see our home page).
 
WHY I DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT- Aug 25, 4 p.m., Pepsi Center.   A speech delivered by Hillary Clinton.
 
WHY SHE DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT- Aug. 25, 8 p.m., Pepsi Center.  A speech delivered by Bill Clinton.
 
LUNCHEON WITH LANNY DAVIS- Aug. 26, noon, Pepsi Center.
 
WHY HILLARY DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT, AND HOW THE FORCES OF EVIL DESTROYED HER CHANCES- Aug. 26, 2 p.m., Pepsi Center.  A speech to be delivered by Lanny Davis.
 
GUERILLA WARFARE: FEMINISM IN THE 21st CENTURY- Aug. 26, 4 p.m., Pepsi Center.  A seminar hosted by Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, and Anderson Cooper.
 
WHY MY OWNER DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT AND THE CASE FOR SPAYING BILL- Aug. 26, 5 p.m., Pepsi Center.  A speech by Socks the Cat, sponsored by Petsmart and PETA.  Free cat toys!
 
HOW AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN CAN DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST BLACK MALE MACHISMO- Aug. 26, 6 p.m., Pepsi Center.  Speakers to be determined.
 
WHY MY MOM DECIDED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT- Aug. 26, 8 p.m., a speech to be delivered by First Daughter, Chelsea Clinton.
 
CROSBY, STILLS, NASH & YOUNG REUNION- Aug. 26, 10 p.m., Pepsi Center.  To the extent possible.
 
DOCUMENTARY: REMEMBERING WOODSTOCK- Aug. 27, midnight/12 a.m., Pepsi Center.  Raffle with door prizes, win John Kerry's Silver Star!  Fireworks.
 
BREAKFAST WITH BARBARA STREISAND- Aug. 27, 10 a.m., Pepsi Center.
 
IF I COULD WALK WITH THE BEARS- Aug. 27, noon, Enchanted Forest Trail, Denver.  A nature walk with Nancy Pelosi.
 
IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN- Aug. 27, 3 p.m., Pepsi Center.  A speech by Al Gore.
 
CIGAR WORKSHOP/HOW TO FORGIVE YOUR SPOUSE AFTER HE MAKES NOT ONE, BUT TWO HUMAN BEINGS BEAR THE SUFFERING FOR HIS OWN DEMENTED SEX DRIVE AND/OR CONFUSED SEXUAL ORIENTATION- Aug. 27, 5 p.m., Holiday Inn Gift Shop.  Bipartisan.  Hosted by Hillary Clinton and Larry Craig's wife.  Please feel free to leave your children at our child care center, operated by the Gay/Lesbian Alliance, or our child care center operated by Rainbow/PUSH. 
 
ROLL CALL VOTE- Aug. 27, 6 p.m., Pepsi Center.  ALL DELEGATES SHOULD CONTACT LANNY DAVIS BEFORE PROCEEDING TO THE VOTING AREA.
 
OBAMA NOMINATION SPEECH- Aug. 28, time to be determined.  Invesco Field*
 
(*=This event may be moved to Hidden Hills Little League Field, 3809 Pinecrest Dr., Denver.)
 
(All attendees are advised to monitor their electronic mail inboxes for any unexpected change of events.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (123) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Roll Call

At this Democratic Party convention in Denver, we will have Hillary Clinton's name presented in the roll call.  At that roll call vote, anything can happen, and it quite possibly will.  With the demise of John Edwards, voters' memories might go into rewind mode, pausing at that final debate going into New Hampshire.  That was the debate where John Edwards and Barack Obama sat there, shooting the breeze and chuckling (and perhaps snickering), completely leaving Hillary out of the inside jokes.  It looked mean-spirited.  Actually, it looked downright nasty.  And yes, it looked sexist.  More than the thoroughly dissected tears, the performance by all three that night may have delivered New Hampshire to Hillary Clinton.
 
Not only, though, do we have the Edwards Factor going into this Big Dem Circus, we have Obama tied today with lucky, lucky John McCain in Gallup polls. 
 
How'd he get so lucky?
 
Well, first of all, it's not all luck.  McCain's vast foreign policy credentials speak for themselves, and Obama hasn't exactly been going for big guns at the veep post to compensate for his own lack in this area.  Instead, he's been out twittering on a far-left branch with Tim Kaine, who also has no foreign policy experience.
 
Birds of a feather.  Please note this writer is not saying that the chickens have come home to roost.
 
So we've got a lightweight courting another lightweight.  Obama probably thought this was pretty cute, considering the Iraq War is as unpopular as it is. 
 
But a funny thing happened on the way to the convention.  The bear woke up.
 
It was a deep hibernation, but it had to come to an end some time.  And the end came just in time to highlight the vast differences between John McCain and Barack Obama in the realm of foreign policy.  And to put some of Obama's potential cabinet members in the spotlight. 
 
That didn't turn out very well for the Change Cabinet.  By almost all estimates, they embarrassed themselves.  Obama himself left much to be desired in terms of his own responses. 
 
So when the big, bad bear bared its teeth at the west, there was something of a very slight bounce for Obama, the Hopemogerer.  But once the voters actually got a chance to think through the responses of the big players, the bounce quickly, understandably, and predictably evaporated.
 
So now, we have presumptive nomineee Barack Obama preparing to take the stage in Denver.  Will he go rolling in, riding the crest of his rhetorical hope and change wave?
 
No, he will not.
 
Barack Obama will limp into this convention, a lame-duck candidate tied in the polls with the less-than-electrifying John McCain.  Obama will have been struck down by his gaffes (his own white grandmother, a typical white person, and all those bitter Pennsylvanians).  He will have been struck down by his allies (Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Ludacris, and Michael Pfleger).  He will have been struck down by his own radicalism (fighting against medical help for babies that survived the abortion procedure, and a very narrow economic agenda in the Illinois General Assembly which is recounted in the Weekly Standard).  He will have been struck down by his own ego (his controlling attitude with the press, his general demeanor disparaged by Jesse Jackson and others, and his celebrity status, so cunningly nurtured by the press and so deftly examined by the McCain campaign). 
 
He's ripe; the Clintons will almost definitely pick him.
 
Barack Obama has already sold his convention to the Clintons.  They own it now, it's theirs.
 
If they could get this far in controlling the convention, taking the actual nomination is a very real possibility.  These are the Clintons we're talking about, here.  The Clintons, with their lust for power, their war rooms, and the memos we've just seen released saying to attack Obama as foreign
 
Hillary Clinton, never the Mary Poppins of the Democrats, "Oh, it's going to be me" Hillary Clinton, well, she's not just going to walk away from an opportunity to seize back her chance at the White House on a roll call vote that just might go her way.
 
No way.  If she can get it, she'll take it.  And Hillary's supporters are often like the candidate herself.  They'll stop at nothing to finish on top in this tangle, so it's a very real possibility.
 
What might get in the way, though, is the enormity and ferocity of the African American vote.  So this theft of the nomination could become a very dicey proposition.  It wouldn't rule it out entirely, though.  If Hillary could actually stage such a coup, she could try to salve the wounds by making Obama her VP.
 
What is probably more likely, though, is that we're seeing the genesis of the Scream Ticket, a prospect that is probably the Dems' last, best hope.  The Hillbill as veep with the overly encumbered but rhetorically gifted Obama at the helm just might work, and they know it.
 
This makes McCain's choice for VP critical.  If he chooses choice, he's finished.  No voter who likes our abortion laws as is is going to go to McCain with an Obama-Hillary ticket in the offing, even if McCain has an abortion himself.
 
He'll be destroyed.
 
So it's roll call time.  We may be being set up for a Scream ticket.  If not, count on seeing Hillary again when the time is right.  In the meantime, McCain had better respond to Obama's abortion "rights" veep candidate in kind.  Otherwise, we may all end up screaming, too. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Dangerous September

What does a cease-fire look like?
 
What does it sound like? 
 
The media, and others, cannot understand why they must suddenly ask themselves these questions.  And this could be a very, very perilous September for Americans, and indeed, the entire world.  The bear has come in from the cold and seems fixated on finding refreshment in the blood it has so relentlessly pursued and now drawn from the tiny, fledgling democracy in its own hemisphere. 
 
The bear has a taste not only for blood, but for oil.  It is not enough for the bear that he has enormous control over the resources in the region; rather, he must have them all.
 
Both blood and oil attracted the bear to Georgia.  Georgia, the friend of the west, deserves no share of the great bear's wealth.  Georgia sits on a valuable pipeline that transports energy resources from the Caspian Sea.  But how much longer it will remain sitting there is anyone's guess at this point.
 
When you look at a cease-fire, and you wonder if it really is a cease-fire, it's not.  Especially when you are dealing with the bear.
 
Cries and pleas and stern rebukes from the west have brought about this so-called cease-fire.  And the bear has heard all of the calls.  The bear knows the voices.  And the bear knows it is not an option to feign deafness.
 
But the bear's response has not been what was expected. 
 
"We are all Georgians."  John McCain knows this bear, and knows him well.  The bear uses mighty teeth and claws to tear open the flesh of its unfortunate prey.  The bear is never tired when he has you in his grasp.  The bear is territorial.  The bear is oddly jealous, too.  And the bear is competitive. 
 
Georgia is in the bear's forest.  Georgia is fair game in that forest.  So the cease-fire that is never silent follows.  And the west be damned.
 
But some in the west don't see the threat.  The left, so anxious to play mother to real bears in its own forests sees no evil in this one, either.  This bear has never been on their shores, in their plains, or in its forest.  This bear, too, will be protected.
 
It's wise to call for diplomacy at this point, but not by making Georgia a party to Russia's wrong.  It becomes eerily like watching a group of nasty men in a smoky back room somewhere blaming the victim for her rape.
 
These calls for diplomacy should not sound weak, either.  Like pleas.  No one should be begging Russia to leave a territory they had no right to invade in the first place.  Russia has been embraced by the west-- particularly the US-- to the extent that the bear has permitted it.  We are now seeing why the relationship has always been chilly, despite constant coddling.
 
The bear is a predator, and this bear lives up to its reputation and instincts.  It loves power.  This is not Winnie the Pooh.  This bear was once a grotesque, terrifying spectacle to those in its forest, and to those in many other forests across the map.  It crushed those foolish enough to move into its sights. 
 
So don't be a fool in this forest, with this bear, because we are all Georgians in this bear's eyes.  Don't love it, don't cuddle it, and don't trust it. 
 
The left makes all kinds of sacrifices for the real bears.  With the cease-fire that may go down in history as the cease-fire that never happened, the left had better protect its own country from sacrifices to this one.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Georgia on Our Minds

Are the only reasons the United States will not respond to Russia's most recent show of aggression in Georgia the US economy and the war in Iraq? 
 
Yes and no.  These are the more immediate reasons that stifle a response; but there are much more far-reaching ones.
 
After the collapse of the USSR, Russia's focus turned towards its southern borders, and the nation that seemed to capture its interest was Iran.  Turkey and Iran were Moscow's main targets, according to one article at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.  According to Robert O. Freedman's article, written in 2001, "Iran is Russia's closest ally in the Middle East.  Russia has been providing a nuclear reactor and sophisticated military equipment to Iran, as well as diplomatic support against U.S. efforts to isolate it."
 
And it turns out that Iran, because of its own oil concerns, was standing with Russia when it came to Georgia's inclinations towards NATO and cooperation with the west.
 
Seems that, back in 2001, a pipeline Georgia had wanted to build would cut in on Iran's plan to supply Turkey with gas that travelled through Iran.  The Georgia pipeline would also have pre-empted some of Russia's energy plans, which included Russia becoming the main supplier for Turkey through the Black Sea.  All of this is recounted in Freedman's article.
 
Now, keep in mind that the objectives of Iran and Russia were in opposition to one another.  Each wanted to be the ultimate supplier, have the ultimate power, over oil and natural gas from the Caspian Sea.  But as Freedman notes, it didn't stop them from cooperating against the interests of Georgia and the west.
 
It is this type of cooperative that ought to keep Americans riveted to this story in Georgia until it de-escalates.  When push comes to shove, Russia and Iran are more than happy to work together against the west, even when they are themselves locked in conflict.
 
Who else can Russia count on in a crisis?
 
Well, last year, according to Chinese Premier Wen Jiabo, Russia's relationship with China was the best it had been in history.  Wen went on to discuss all the great developments that the two have reaped through a strategic cooperative partnership, which was ten years old at the time he spoke. 
 
Putin, last year, reassured China that it had "Moscow's full support over Taiwan, a breakaway island that Beijing wants back..."   (AFX News Limited/Forbes.com).
 
So Iran and China.  This is disturbing news from two fronts.  One's view of which is worse might be subject to some debate, but it would seem clear that the US stake in Iraq, coupled with America's antagonistic relationship with Iran, make Russia's standing in the Middle East a subject of tremendous anxiety as events continue to unfold in Osettia. 
 
The Middle Eastern Review of International Affairs (MERIA) noted that the Kremlin decided to invite Hamas to Moscow in 2006.
 
MERIA also notes that Putin shut down two Russian papers for printing that Mohammed cartoon before Hamas arrived.
 
Overall, though, one would have to also concede that Putin made great efforts to maintain his relationship with Israel.  But it didn't stop him from selling nuclear technologies to Iran.  A source in MERIA also muses Russia may have "tacitly protected Iran's nuclear program" as well.
 
So we have that special friendship with Iran, and our own involvement in Iraq.  There is also this very warm relationship with China.  Normally, it wouldn't be something the average American would even need to think about.  But we had better all be thinking about it now.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Little Ossetia

When Putin comes marching through Georgia.  Then what?  Little Ossetia could mean big, global-sized problems.
 
And it is little.  Georgia itself is just slightly smaller than the state of South Carolina.  But the stakes loom large as the situation escalates.
 
Georgia has a history of clinging fiercely to its independence.  Georgia was actually independent from Soviet Russia for a relatively short time after the Russian Revolution and was taken only by force.
 
Ossetia is a rebel region of Georgia.  What sparked Georgia's actions is a source of debate.  Russia's ensuing aggression, though, is obvious on its face.  Russia, ever a power anxious to kill a mosquito with a bazooka, is back.  Georgia has requested a cease-fire.  Understandable now that the bazooka has arrived on the scene.  But in honesty, Russia hasn't just arrived.  Russia has been the agent provocateur in this situation, a fact that can easily be confirmed if you look at the wider picture that is just now coming into focus.  Just last year, Russia bombed Georgia territory twice, according to Svante Cornell, writing for the UK Guardian.  Not only that, but, as Cornell reports, it's been giving Russian citizenship-- illegally-- to Ossetians.
 
Georgia is a very "western" nation, and Russians seem to have been looking for this fight for some time.  The Georgians have not just given it to them; rather, the Russians have sought it out at every opportunity.
 
According to the Times of London, Georgia desperately wanted to become a member of both the EU and NATO.  If one wonders why NATO rejected Georgia, a quick web search will produce a Fox News article that says, "Russian President Vladimir Putin scored a major diplomatic coup by scuttling the NATO membership bids of Ukraine and Georgia even before he reached the NATO summit."
 
The bazooka.
 
The request that said bazooka now withdraw from the fight it has so shamelessly provoked ("Step over that line!") has been met with unanimous appeals to stop.  From the current captain of the EU presidential volleyball team (France is the current "rotating" president), to President Bush, to our Secretary of State, and our current presidential candidates.  Some of these appeals have been stronger than others.  Those making the stronger appeals should be applauded.
 
It seems like it may well be the Year of the Maverick.  His comments on this issue address a bullying thug much more effectively than Obama's.  And Russia's attacks also involve energy, an issue that the Republicans have tapped into and are making into their own.  Desperately important pipelines move through Georgia.  As Cornell notes, "Georgia's position astride the western access route to the Caspian Sea's energy reserves and central Asia give it geopolitical significance."
 
From the Times of London, "If Georgia falls, Europe's hopes of energy independence from Russia fall too."
 
If Russia succeeds in its latest bazooka effort, it could bring all of Europe to its knees.
 
Maybe Putin will tell them to grab their tire gauges.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (21) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Audacity of Hope In A Tire Gauge

Our progressive left continues to surprise in the latest tire gauge debate.
 
Congress, in the meantime, has retired.  To spend time huddled and sweating, in agony over desks in twilight-lit rooms, trying desperately to figure out how to help Americans paying astronomically high prices for gas.  But Barack Obama already has one answer.
 
Tire gauges!  A plump tire rolls us on to energy independence.  And we all live happily ever after.
 
What kind of an imbecile would inject such a comment into a national debate over such an issue?  And what kind of media would rally to his defense?
 
Let's look first at the merits of Obama's argument, which is that nice, fat tires will be a helpful weapon in our arsenal in the war on oil enslavement.
 
Well, Time tells us it will yield a whopping three percent of demand, whereas offshore drilling will only meet one percent of demand (two decades from now).
 
But Human Events tells a different story on the numbers.  First of all, this is an exploratory ban.  No exploration means little reliability in terms of the estimates.  Which means that no one knows, for sure, how much oil is at stake when it comes to offshore drilling.  The estimates are highly uncertain because of the exploratory ban.
 
But just based on the figures available, we can guess that there are several years of US consumption.  And this doesn't really even approach a full discussion of the oil-rich Arctic.
 
The tire gauge solution injected into such a serious debate is, again, the act of a complete imbecile.  And not only has the media been playing games with the numbers and facts on behalf of their candidate, they've also been playing games with the underlying logic of the premises involved.
 
Hundreds of millions are suddenly supposed to be out there with their little tire gauges.  These are the same hundreds of millions that the left-wing press doesn't trust to have unprotected sex to save their own lives, or to learn about their daughter's abortion before (and then after) it happens.  Or to teach their kids what they need to know about sex.  Or to avoid trans-fats.
 
Barack Obama is evidently going to be our Tom Destry, riding into town, not with a Winchester rifle (we all know how the left stands on letting someone have...  a gun!), but with a tire gauge.  And he's going to reverse this interesting trend so consistently noted by our busy press.
 
Okay.
 
Do the Democrats really care that this country is oil dependent?
 
Sen. Charles Schumer (D, NY) requested another million barrels from OPEC some time back, I think.  Barack Obama is waving a tire gauge with an American flag.  And Nancy Pelosi is nowhere to be found.
 
What is it, exactly, that these people really care about?
 
Black bears, meticulously restored coastal marshes, and strange looking birds and plants that you just can't find anywhere else.
 
And that means keeping a vast amount of your corner of their planet unexplored for oil.
 
This is why the left-wing press is now rallying to Obama's defense.  Helpless plants are in jeopardy right now, while a useless group of rag-tag human beings is crying out for cheaper gas so they can go to work and care for their kids (if they've gotten it together enough to have any).
 
Many members of Congress, the press, and certain presidential candidates, are willing to sacrifice the comfort, and, in some cases, the futures, of fellow Americans in the name of their planet.  Their planet is filled with "other countries" drilling while this one keeps vast areas unexplored, untouched, and pristine.
 
It's kind of funny when you consider their stands on social issues like pornography, premarital sex, contraception, and abortion. 
 
Choice!
 
Congress, the media, and others have also made a choice by clinging to this policy.  Let's give the left-wing politicians in the back pocket of environmentalists, and the left press, a morning-after pill they'll never forget.  Offshore drilling will spare the black bears and the whales.  Conress may not fare so well.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive